Program languages speed comparison: различия между версиями
Перейти к навигации
Перейти к поиску
| (не показана 1 промежуточная версия этого же участника) | |||
| Строка 1: | Строка 1: | ||
[[Category:Programming language]] | [[Category:Programming language]] | ||
| − | [http://vincebuffalo.com/blog/2012/03/07/thoughts-on-julia-and-r.html Comparison] of [http://julialang.org/ Julia] to languages like [[JS]], [[R]], [[Go]] relative to [[C++]] | + | [http://vincebuffalo.com/blog/2012/03/07/thoughts-on-julia-and-r.html Comparison] of [http://julialang.org/ Julia] to languages like [[JS]], [[Python]], [[Java]], [[R]], [[Go]] relative to [[C++]] |
| − | http:// | + | http://julialang.org/benchmarks/ |
| + | |||
| + | [[image:ProgramLanguagesCompared2Julia.png]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [http://wiki.jmol.org/index.php/JSmol_pros_and_cons#JavaScript_is_slower_than_Java_by_a_factor_of_6-10 JavaScript is slower than Java by a factor of 6-10... Smaller molecules (<10,000 atoms) are handled quite well. Large molecules (>20,000 atoms; see table at right) may be slow to load and process.] | ||
Текущая версия на 13:32, 10 февраля 2017
Comparison of Julia to languages like JS, Python, Java, R, Go relative to C++
http://julialang.org/benchmarks/
